CED on your side: Two wrongful disciplines withdrawn after SEIU members exercise their union rights

CED On Your Side
Read more contract enforcement victories >>

In two separate cases, SEIU 521 members successfully overturned disciplinary actions after they exercised their right to respond to the allegations against them.

Rosalin RemolloRosalin Remollo is an Environmental Services Aide on the graveyard shift at Natividad Medical Center (NMC). When management alleged that Rosalin failed to complete a specific job assignment, she knew they had gotten their facts wrong. But without any witnesses, it was Rosalin’s word against her manager’s.

“In my 13 years at NMC, I have not had to deal with something like this. Most people don’t realize that we have these rights. I am so thankful for the support from my union and the co-workers on my shift. Because of them, management realized they didn’t have a case and backed down.”
— Rosalin Remollo

Our SEIU 521 Contract Enforcement Department located a nurse who works with Rosalin on the graveyard shift. She confirmed that Rosalin had completed the assignment, as directed, and she signed a written statement in support of Rosalin. After showing this evidence to the Hospital CEO at the Skelly hearing, NMC decided to withdraw its proposal to discipline.

In a similar case at CHISPA Housing Management, Eloisa Sarabia found herself being disciplined for allegations that were not true. Part of Eloisa’s job as a Resident Manager is to keep track of maintenance work orders at the various properties that CHISPA operates. Eloisa was suspended for allegedly not closing out those work orders on time before a state audit.

After our Contract Enforcement Department filed a grievance, we scheduled a meeting with management. The evidence showed there was no way Eloisa could have closed out the work orders on time because she received them only 10 minutes before the end of her shift, and she was not scheduled to work the following day (which just happened to be the day of the audit). Therefore, CHISPA withdrew the discipline due to lack of evidence that Eloisa was solely responsible for not closing out the work orders, and Eloisa received back pay.

Due Process – Public Sector vs. Private Sector

Public sector employees (not on probation) have a right to due process under the 1975 California Supreme Court Skelly v. State Personnel Board decision. The decision requires that public employers give prior notice of their intent to discipline employees, who then have a right to respond to the evidence that the proposed discipline is based on. The meeting where an employee responds to the allegations is commonly referred to as a “Skelly hearing.”

Due process is a little different in the private sector. Employees often do not get an opportunity to respond to allegations until after the discipline is already imposed. Usually we must file a grievance under the union contract, and then schedule a grievance meeting in order to show management that the discipline is unjust.

Whether you work in the public sector or private sector, it is important that you exercise your right to respond to a disciplinary action so that all facts are considered by management.

Did you like this? Share it:

3 Responses to “CED on your side: Two wrongful disciplines withdrawn after SEIU members exercise their union rights”

  1. Dr Ngo says:

    I ask myself until when the employers know how to treat the employees those are human beings with love, generosity, compassion and humanity

    Very sad !!!
    Dr Ngo, Visalia Health Clinic , HHSA

  2. JULIE says:

    When I excepted a position offered to me, I was accused of being racist from a co-worker who felt she should have gotten the offer, and made it clear to me ” I am out of here” meaning she was going to get me fired or transferred out. There was no proof of racism, she and I had a friendship, we drove to LA to be on the Price is Right together. Well, to make a long story short, I lost, I was charged , I was transferred, and I was suspended to days without pay! I was also tricked into signing something that would not allow me to sue the County in the case. Talk about dirty! Now, how is this all legal? What because I am Caucasian I have no rights? I am automaticly found guilty with no proof. No proof because it was NOT TRUE! I am not raciest, and it makes me sick to my stomach that I was labeled as one, treated unfair, and had NO rights of my own. So much more detail, but I have put it behind me, and have tried to move forward in my life, but for what it is worth, guess who is working the position I was offered? ” sadly, she did” Just go’s to show you, NICE SYSTEM WE HAVE!

Comments about CED on your side: Two wrongful disciplines withdrawn after SEIU members exercise their union rights are welcome. Off-topic comments and other violations of our community guidelines may be withheld or removed. Comments do not appear immediately after posting.

Leave a Reply